How Failure to Measure Training Outcomes Hurts Your Reputation Without You Knowing It

Fun vs. Metrics

I was speaking at a recent gathering of government relations professionals where we discussed the importance of not just conducting fun, entertaining grassroots and PAC trainings, but actually measuring the behavioral change among grassroots / PAC trainees.

I am a believer in making training fun (ask my clients), but also in measuring behavioral change. I also believe that PAC’s and grassroots organizations need to create crisp success metrics and adhere to them, and I was preaching that prior to the current economic climate which makes such metrics vital. Considering the economic climate, you would think it’s common sense to demonstrate ROI...you would think.

During the workshop, I was presented with a surprising but revealing comment. It went something like this:

“Amy, I have to disagree with you. I think that training should really be fun and that we can’t expect too much out of our trainees. I’m not convinced that measuring the amount of post-training behavioral change is the thing to do.”

Now, if I didn’t like the guy so much, I would have throttled him on the spot. But I liked him, and he was sincere. At the risk of him thinking that I was raised by feral cats, I didn’t challenge him, but gently urged him to think about measuring his grassroots advocates’ behavior, and to give it a try sometime.

And then, in the “You can’t make this stuff up” category, 15 minutes later he raised his hand again. At the risk of a drawn out disagreement in front of 50 of his colleagues, I thought to myself, “What the heck, let him throw me another monster.” He did. He asked: 

“Amy, how can our government relations shop get more respect? How do we demonstrate our value?”

Again, you can’t make this stuff up.  Earlier he told me that metrics weren’t necessary, just having “fun” training events was what mattered. Can you connect the dots? 

The Best Measure Up

Contrast that with one group that always makes the list of the most effective lobbying groups in the nation. They hired me to conduct a grassroots training workshop, and took me up on my suggestion to conduct a pre-training benchmarking survey, and to follow up with their members six months later to determine the level of behavioral change.  

After compiling the initial results, I found that, from an audience of about 150, there were actually more advocates who had met with their lawmaker than had emailed, phoned or written their lawmaker. Think about that. Can you say that about your advocates?

Of all groups, they had the best excuse for not doing any type of measurement, as their grassroots volunteers were already performing at a high level. But they wanted to be better. It was a great reminder that there are reasons why some groups always make the “best of” lists besides their large membership or large PAC.   

Don’t be afraid of what you’ll find out by collecting data on your grassroots volunteers’ activities. No man becomes a fool until he stops asking questions.

For our turn-key measurement tools, go to www.showaltergroup.com and click on “Products.”

Copyright 2009
The Showalter Group, Inc.
www.showaltergroup.com


IN THIS ISSUE

Amy Live and Uncut
Amy in the News
News from Innovate to Motivate
Top Tips
What's New