Roots of Success Newsletter
Research Reviews
September 2010

Does Fear Influence or Immobilize?

 
Within the past 25 years, the Library of Congress has recorded over 1,000 books with Armageddon or apocalypse in the title. Certainly many industries and causes gain adherence via fear. But what does the research say about fear as a motivator, and how does it impact how grassroots and PAC professionals engage their volunteers?

I was hired to conduct a training workshop at a national trade association conference where the audience was comprised of their state chapter government relations directors and state executives, one of my favorite audiences.

I was sharing with them how to frame the benefits of PAC and grassroots participation and the "M" question came up. You guessed it - the motivation question. One of the state executives was frustrated that people weren't motivated to give to his PAC. He felt that if they could see how various lawmakers interacted with their industry versus their opponents, especially in a committee hearing setting, they would be enraged by the unfairness of it all and moved to contribute to the PAC. I thought it was a great idea and was getting ready to tell him so, until he told me part two of the story.

He took them to a committee hearing and let them witness how the chairman and majority members of the committee treated their industry representatives. They saw how questions were tougher on them than their opponents and how their opponents received more time to testify, etc.

After he told the story, I asked him if it motivated his members to contribute to the PAC, and he reported that it did not. This of course was his frustration. He felt like he gave them a vivid example of what was at stake, but it still did not make a difference in his PAC receipts.

He had half of the formula right - to present vivid information that demonstrates inherent unfairness in real time. However, there was one problem - he did not give them what I will call the "post - fear action plan."

The Post-Fear Action Plan

Research has demonstrated that fear based communications usually stimulate people to take action to reduce a threat. But the rule has one important exception: when the fear produced message shows the danger, but your stakeholders are not given crisp, clear, effective means of reducing the danger, they may deal with it by "blocking out" the information or thinking it does not apply to them. Health researcher Howard Leventhal conducted an experiment where students were given a public health pamphlet detailing the dangers of tetanus infection. There were two pamphlets - one was filled with the frightening details of the consequences of contracting tetanus, the other one did not have that information. In addition, some did receive a specific plan for how to arrange to get a tetanus injection, others did not. Leventhal found that the high fear message motivated the participants to get a tetanus injection only if it included a plan with clear steps they could take to get the injection. The more clearly people understand the exact behaviors needed to dissipate the fear, the less they will block out your message.

The bottom line #1: You can use fear as a motivator, but you must articulate tangible, crisp, behaviors people can take to address their fear. Otherwise, they will ignore your message and inertia ensues.

The bottom line #2: You know how to scare your people, but do you know what they should do to address the situation beyond "making your voice heard" or contacting their legislator?

Do Generation Based Grassroots Communication Tactics Matter?

One of the questions that I invariably hear at each and every gathering of government relations professionals is, "How do I reach Generation X? How about Generation Y? How about the Millenials? How about the Boomers?" And on it goes.

Dr. Rhoads and I have always responded that while each generation likes to think that the evolutionary process has made their brains different than those 20 years older than them, evolutionary psychology shows that human psychology has not changed since it's been scientifically examined. While the vehicles for the outreach may be different based on age, isn't good outreach good outreach regardless of one's age?

Our belief is that good communication and good persuasion are effective no matter how old someone is - after all, everybody wants recognition, they want credit for their ideas, they want input into how they do their work (paid or volunteer) they want autonomy, they want to know how their work (paid or volunteer) makes a difference, and they want to make their own decisions. Finally some common sense on this obsession from blogger Jessica Stillman. She took on common management advice on how to talk to Traditionalists, Gen Y, Boomers, etc. Stillman took a list of specific communication tips for those audiences and switched those tips into different categories by sticking some of the "Boomer" tips into the "Gen X"list. Here is a selection of some of those tips:

1. Empower them to make their own decisions.

2. Allow them to experiment with their jobs.

3. Have an open door policy in which you are available for team members to ask questions and receive guidance.

4. Give recognition whenever possible.

5. Do not block their path to decision makers.

6. In the event of a crisis, do not shut them out.

7. Use technology to make team meetings easier.

8. Talk to them about their long term plans.

All those tips sound pretty reasonable, right? You probably would not be shocked if that list was promoted as tips on good workplace communications with a title something like "Eight Ways to Communicate Better."

Stillman reveals that answers #1 and #8 are for Traditionalists, #2 and #4 for Boomers, #5 and #7 for Gen X, #3 and #6 for Gen Y.

Isn't good communication just good communication no matter how old you are?

The bottom line: rather than looking for the silver bullet to reach certain age groups, how about consistently practicing solid, time tested communication tactics? Give volunteers some autonomy and recognition and you should be just fine.

Read it and reap: "Are Age Based Communication Strategies Bunk?" http://www.bnet.com/blog/entry-level/are-age-based-communication-strategies-bunk/2660

News from Innovate to Motivate

Innovate to Motivate will be held February 8-11, 2011 in San Antonio at the Hotel Contessa, www.thehotelcontessa.com, an all-suite hotel on the Riverwalk.

Tuesday Evening Salon

We have an exciting new conference format that will instantly connect you with your fellow I2M conference attendees via our Salon on Tuesday, February 8 from 5-7 p.m., where everyone gets equal air time to talk about themselves, what they are working on, and to offer resources to your fellow I2M community members.

New Conference Schedule (and new registration fee!)

We know that many busy government relations professionals can't be out of the office for four days. . .so we are giving you options with a conference format that retains all the interaction I2M is known for, but within specific time slots so that you can determine the schedule that's best for you. You can attend and be out of the office only 2 days that week, or 3 or 4 - it's up to you. And, our registration fee is discounted from our 2010 rates!

Community Service Morning

Our community service morning will be held on Friday morning, February 11 with the USO, which is right across the street from the Hotel Contessa.

Conference Curriculum

We'll have over 20 workstorms for you to choose from, but here's a peek at our 2011 curriculum:

  • How to overcome internal roadblocks to PAC and grassroots engagement
  • The latest from the FEC on what you can and can't do with social media for PAC fundraising
  • The Political Science Fair
  • The psychology of using humor in campaigns - when does it work, and when does it backfire, and how you can use it to your advantage
  • How to use social media to streamline your communications
  • How to generate new ideas through free writing (from Mark Levy, the author of the new book "Accidental Genius")
  • The latest trends arising from the Citizen's United case
  • The psychology of building online trust
  • Grassroots and PAC Town Halls
  • How to lead volunteers in a hostile environment (from one of the founders of the Tea Party!)
  • Association PAC law
  • Persuasive presentation skills for government relations professionals
  • How to create a Key Contact program on steroids
  • How to make your grassroots and PAC compliment rather than compete with each other
  • Coalition management - how to decide if you should create, join or quit a coalition
Amy Live & Uncut


The Most Effective Way to Communicate With Your Legislator

Do You Have A Grassroots Program?

I2M Call For Presentations

The FEC and Social Media - Trend Analysis from I2M Faculty Member Brett Kappel

The Target Political Contribution Backlash - Getting Back to Basics

The Latest on PAC Burn Rates

The Bailout and Persuasion Tactics

The Program Edge

The Most Successful Get Out the Vote Program Tactics

Could Corporate New Voter-Drive Initiatives Backfire?

How to Strengthen Your Corporate Grassroots Program's Weakest Link: The Middle Managers

The Influence Tactics of Fortune's "Power 25"

How to Manage the Employee/Member Expectations of a Grassroots Program

Start With the Proper Foundation

Originality and Your Brand

IN THIS ISSUE

Research Reviews
Top Tips

News from Innovate to Motivate
Amy Live and Uncut